Long before Thomas Paine set sail to America in late 1774, the colonists had grown accustomed to doing things their way, and their way worked, especially with respect to doing business.
England was a mercantilist nation and mercantilists held that wealth was a zero sum game: in order for one entity to gain wealth, another must lose an equal amount. To carry the idea a little further, if the state wished to gain wealth, its citizens must sacrifice their own.
By law, colonists weren't allowed to manufacture goods on their own but were required to ship raw materials to England where the goods were manufactured then shipped back to the colonies to be purchased. In this narrowly focused arrangement, British monarchs could not forsee the influence of capitalism. In Common Sense, Paine stated that the colonies had grown more vibrant than George III wished them to be. "To bring the matter to one point. Is the power who is jealous of our prosperity, a proper power to govern us?"
Capitalism in the American Colonies
By the late 1700s colonists were bred to be independent. Great Britain's distance from the American shores, and her interests in India, Nova Scotia and the Caribbean, as well as continuing scuffles with France and Spain, made enforcement of mercantilism on the colonists nigh impossible. These upstarts manufactured their own goods, owned their own land, grew their own food, traded freely with one another and with other countries, and prospered tremendously. (The Wealth of a Nation to Be, Alice Hanson Jones; Colombia University Press, 1980)
Capitalism was creating wealth in the colonies, a situation that a war weary and cash strapped Great Britain could not allow. A series of laws intended to gain control of the colonies and their prosperity, including the infamous Stamp Act of 1765, managed to do little more than turn an already independent-minded people into an independence leaning people.
Unavoidable Rebellion
Using the death of 93 colonial militia at Lexington and Concord as a fulcrum, Paine levered his argument toward rebellion. "No man was a warmer wisher for reconciliation than myself, before the fatal nineteenth of April, 1775..."
Convinced that reconciliation was no longer possible, Paine laments Britain's interest in its own well being before that of its colonial holdings. Whether that is a reasonable argument may be of some debate, but Paine's attitude reveals the truth that once men have tasted independence, the softest oppression irritates the soul as much as iron chains irritate the skin. For Paine, there was no turning back. To reconcile would mean the destruction of a way of life that the world had not yet known. "Reconciliation and ruin are nearly related."
Join the Conversation